Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
In new @DailyCaller op-ed, @GroverNorquist urges Congress to question IRS agents involved in this scandal: http://t.co/M0gV2GpQ9G
taxreformer
Gov. Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law: http://t.co/iENksi7uQi
taxreformer
IRS tax return preparation invites a conflict of interest: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
These destructive #Obamacare tax hikes will soon be implemented: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
"Saying the Marketplace Fairness Act is fair is like saying the Affordable Care Act makes health care affordable" -@MarshaBlackburn
taxreformer
"I can't believe #Obamacare led to higher health care costs," said no economist ever: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
The Honorable Sam Johnson
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Congressman:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform, I express my strong support for H.R. 690, the “Modernize Our Bookkeeping In the Law for Employee's (MOBILE) Cell Phone Act of 2009.” I would urge all Members of Congress to co-sponsor and support this common sense modernization of our tax code.
Congress has chosen to list several items in the tax code as “listed property.” These items—most namely computers and automobiles—can be provided by an employer, but the employee must disclose any personal use of the items, and pay taxes on what is essentially an in-kind wage.
When Congress added on cell phones as listed property in 1989—some twenty years ago—these products were very different than they are today. Bulky, cumbersome, and expensive, they more resembled a modern laptop than a modern Blackberry. The per-employee cost of office coffee is likely higher today than the per-employee cost of a cell phone personal device.
Put simply, the intent of Congress (to limit a lucrative fringe benefit given to high-flying executives) is painfully out of date. No one today views iPhones, Blackberries, or other personal electronic devices as “luxuries.” Rather, they are an inexpensive and convenient way for employees to be in 24-hour contact with work. Any personal use of these devices—a line which gets grayer every year—is not significant, and not worth the extensive recordkeeping and meddlesome tax payments of the listed property rules.
The House passed a bill last year that would remove cell phones from listed property, and the Joint Tax Committee scored this tax relief at a mere $237 million over ten years. For the nuisance and enforcement costs this provision creates, everyone involved should view the “cost” as little more than a rounding error, and your bill as a common-sense update of the original intent of Congress two decades ago.
Sincerely,
Grover G. Norquist
To follow Ryan Ellis's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @ryanlellis