- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATR Supports Full Repeal of Death Tax
From Ryan Ellis on Monday, November 30, 2009 2:56 PMATR sent the following letter today to Congress (read full version):
***
This week, the U.S. House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on H.R. 4154, a bill which would create a permanent death tax structure with a top rate of 45 percent and an exemption level of $3.5 million.
H.R. 4154 is a tragic departure from years of Congressional intent to kill the death tax. Rather than bury the death tax in a mere 31 days (as is called for under current law), this bill would create a new 45 percent rate in 2010 and into the future.
H.R. 4154 fails to index the death tax for inflation. By setting the exemption at the 2009 level of $3.5 million and failing to index to CPI, more and more households, small businesses, and family farms will find themselves with a death tax liability. The same is true of the death tax brackets—the top rate will apply to taxable estate sizes over $1.5 million. Assuming historical inflation, these death tax levels will be cut in half in real terms with every passing generation (20 to 25 years). This “death tax generational bracket creep” harkens back to the stagflation and savings erosion of the 1970s.
H.R. 4154 would leave the United States with the third-highest death tax rate in the developed world. According to a 2007 study by the American Council for Capital Formation, only South Korea and Japan would have a higher top death tax rate than the U.S. In fact, half of the developed countries in their survey have no death tax whatsoever. In a world of increasingly-mobile capital, having one of the highest death tax rates in the world simply makes no sense.
H.R. 4154 would leave in place the most unpopular tax among U.S. voters. Polls consistently have shown for nearly two decades that between 67 and 75 percent of likely voters favor full and permanent repeal of the death tax. This is remarkable considering that only a small percentage of estates will ever be liable for the tax. Any Congressman voting for H.R. 4154 would find themselves in a decided minority.
Americans for Tax Reform remains committed to fully and permanently repealing the death tax. We stand willing to support legislation which does so.














Comments
But if you're not planning on dying in 2010 (which most of us aren't), HR 4154 will save your family a lot of money because, if it doesn't pass, you'll only be able to give $1,000,000 (rather than $3,500,000) away tax free and the rest of your estate will be taxed at 55% (rather than 45%) - plus, the state death tax will come back in many states, thus upping your tax bill some more. Funny how this letter fails to mention these little details.
>> TaxLawyer Wednesday, December 2, 2009 6:42 PM Report Comment