Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
New @Mercatus video breaks down what’s at stake for states considering expanding Medicaid under #Obamacare: http://t.co/9TH9ftOBPF
taxreformer
List of Upcoming Obamacare Tax Hikes http://t.co/yEdM94o6lw
taxreformer
ATR’s @MDuppler discusses the ramifications of the developing IRS scandal on @VarneyCo: http://t.co/ZvMvMW9fRE
taxreformer
In new @DailyCaller op-ed, @GroverNorquist urges Congress to question IRS agents involved in this scandal: http://t.co/M0gV2GpQ9G
taxreformer
Gov. Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law: http://t.co/iENksi7uQi
taxreformer
IRS tax return preparation invites a conflict of interest: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
These destructive #Obamacare tax hikes will soon be implemented: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
"Saying the Marketplace Fairness Act is fair is like saying the Affordable Care Act makes health care affordable" -@MarshaBlackburn
taxreformer
"I can't believe #Obamacare led to higher health care costs," said no economist ever: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
THE TAX TRUTH BEHIND REPEALING ETHANOL CREDITS
In an effort to create an “all of the above” approach to energy solutions, some organizations (in an earnest attempt to try to be helpful) have recently proposed legislation that centers on repealing Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 40(h), the Reduced Credit for Ethanol Blenders, for U.S. energy manufacturers.
Unfortunately, this corporate tax credit has been labeled as a “subsidy”, which confuses an income tax credit with spending. The “tax subsidy” concept is an invention of the Left. It is meant to distort an otherwise clear distinction between taxes and spending. Regardless of its effects on energy policy, this remains a corporate income tax credit.
Current law provides an income tax credit for the production of blended ethanol fuel. This credit is scheduled to expire at the end of 2010. All ethanol reform proposals include reducing or eliminating this income tax credit. This may have implications for the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.
34 Senators and 172 Congressmen have signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. In so doing, they promised to their constituents and the American people that they would “oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions or credits…”
Repealing the ethanol credit IS A CORPORATE INCOME TAX INCREASE and is therefore a PLEDGE VIOLATION unless the increase is offset completely with other income tax cuts.
ATR continues to oppose the current federally mandated use of expensive, inefficient domestic corn ethanol while taxing more efficient, imported ethanol made from sugar cane. This harms both the consumer seeking to purchase ethanol and consequently increases the price of food. However, any attempt to remove this income tax credit must be addressed while remaining tax revenue neutral.
Note: Budget neutrality (which is concerned with deficits) has no role in determining applicability of the Pledge. Rather, tax revenue neutrality (as scored by the JCT) is the only relevant metric for the purposes of the Pledge.
For more information, contact tax policy director Ryan Ellis at rellis@atr.org or federal energy analyst Brian Johnson at bjohnson@atr.org