Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
The Education and Workforce Committee holds hearing on NLRB "Recess" Appointments http://t.co/2ED4u4t8
taxreformer
Senate Highway Bill Violates Taxpayer Protection Pledge http://t.co/z7IETuQT
taxreformer
OK Gov. Mary Fallin Releases Bold Tax Reform Plan http://t.co/oRPWYGKb
taxreformer
Senator Hatch looks to improve the Senate's Highway Bill http://t.co/rOZQENlQ
taxreformer
Senator Hatch tries to make a bad bill better http://t.co/F6VYT9NI
taxreformer
ATR Opposes Retroactive Tax Hikes http://t.co/XX2lRMyH
taxreformer
Has your Governor Issued a Proclamation Honoring Ronald Reagan on Feb 6th ? http://t.co/bHatxoTg
taxreformer
RT @timothy_stanley: Just interviewed @GroverNorquist. Flipped my view of the recession/election: recovery due to stopping Obama tax hik ...
timothy_stanley
RT @GroverNorquist: Reagan Birthday proclamations by 34 Governors, both R and D (Utah & Nevada just joined) 16 bitter D Govs fail test o ...
GroverNorquist
CoGC: House Republicans Lead on Budget Honesty http://t.co/wHJpzOC1
taxreformer
ATR explains "passive loss" repeal in the most recent installment of the ATR Energy Tax Hike Series:
ATR Obama Budget Analysis: Energy Tax Hike Series
Passive Loss Exception Repeal
Current Law
A generation ago, “tax shelters” were popular and legal tax-avoidance strategies. The most common form a tax shelter took back then was for someone to become a limited partner in a partnership that had losses year after year. These losses would be passed along to the partner-investor, who would use them to offset other income. There were few restrictions on this practice.
That all changed in 1986 with the passage of the Tax Reform Act. Congress required “passive losses” (losses incurred by businesses in which the taxpayer didn’t have any material participation) to be carried forward, not used against other income. The losses from the passive activity now can only be realized if the activity eventually turns a profit, or when the investor sells his interest in the activity. This legislative change drove a stake through the heart of the tax shelter industry.
Congress made several exceptions to the passive loss rule, though. One of these was a working interest in an oil or gas property. For these investments, the rules are much like they were before 1986.
Obama Proposal
The FY 2010 Administration Budget repeals the passive loss exception for working interests in oil and gas properties starting in 2011. This has a ten-year cost of $49 billion, and when fully phased in will increase taxes annually by $6 billion.
ATR Analysis
This is a clear and blatant attempt to increase taxes on America’s energy manufacturing sector. The policy rationale behind the passive loss exception in current law is debatable, but repealing it should only be done in the context of further tax reform. If the federal government is going to be a full partner in your profitable years, and a deferred partner in your losing years, then you ought to at least get lower tax rates out of the deal. Under no circumstances should this exception be repealed in the context of a net tax hike.
For more information, contact tax policy director Ryan Ellis at rellis@atr.org or federal energy manger Brian Johnson at bjohnson@atr.org