- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATR Energy Tax Hike Series: Cap and Trade
From Brian M. Johnson & Ryan Ellis on Monday, April 6, 2009 9:30 AMBelow is the ATR energy tax hike series on cap and trade. ATR sends each item in the series to all members of Congress. If your member of Congress votes for this proposal...they can't say they "didn't know" this would cost jobs in your town.
ATR Obama Budget Analysis: Energy Tax Hike Series
Cap and Trade
Current Law
When world economies engage in global trade, there must be production of goods. This production of goods emits carbon. Under the Kyoto Protocol, several countries have implemented a method of cap and trade. Cap and trade is a system by which the government sets an arbitrary level, or “cap”, on the amount of carbon that companies are allowed to emit. Companies must then purchase credits from the government that represent the right to emit a specific amount. Companies that wish to increase their emissions must buy credits (the “trade”) from those who produce less.
In an effort to maintain United State competitiveness and productivity, there is not a current cap and trade system in effect. Every cap and trade system proposed in the U.S. Congress has been rejected by not only members, but the general public as well.
Obama Proposal
The Obama FY 2010 budget proposal will implement a cap and trade system on all American businesses.
ATR Analysis
The implementation of a cap and trade program on American businesses will result in a tax increase of $646 billion dollars over 10 years as called for in the Obama budget.
When fully phased in, this will be a $100 billion per year tax on American businesses and a $3,100 tax on every American family. This tax will decrease U.S. competitiveness and increase consumer costs.
Cap and trade systems punish businesses for being successful. As companies become more successful and employ more Americans, their production of goods increases. Along with this production, comes the natural byproduct from increased energy use. The purposeful taxation of this success by forcing an arbitrary cap on production emissions is counterproductive to a prosperous economy. Every family in America will pay this cap and trade tax in the form of higher energy prices.
For more information, contact tax policy director Ryan Ellis at rellis@atr.org or federal energy manager Brian Johnson at bjohnson@atr.org
Click here for the printable PDF.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: ENERGY, POLITICS, CONGRESS, SPENDING, OBAMA, BUDGET, Federal














Comments
I am against any new tax that government wants to put on the American people. This cap and trade tax is just more control for government and takes more of my hard earned money. The current administration needs to do the same. When I hear of a Billion dollars cut from a budget I may begin to see they hear what we are saying from the TEA Parties. But only cutting $100 million is nothing more than a joke. The majority of American's can see right through this farce.
>> CoonOkie Friday, May 1, 2009 2:19 PM Report Comment
Your own numbers don't track. $646 billion over ten years is $65 billion per year, not $100 billion. And $100 billion in taxes passed on to the 117 million families in this country (your figure) comes to under $900 a year, not $3100.
>> Freya Friday, May 15, 2009 9:56 PM Report Comment
Im wondering if this is part of Obamas "I will not tax the Middle Class" plan??
>> Vaughn Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:02 AM Report Comment