- Leaked Memo Shows SEIU Controls Senate Labor Nom Vote Schedule (AWF Site »)
- Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes
- Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy Releases Local Transparency Study for VA (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
- New Transparency Resource for Connecticut Taxpayers (CFA Site »)
- Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package
- About Those Jobs Numbers (CFA Site »)
- More Job Creation By The Federal Government
Monday, February 8, 2010
- Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- February 6, 2010: Ronald Reagan Day
Saturday, February 6, 2010
- The Obama Budget
- Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs
- Let's Expedite Debate on Spending Reductions! (CFA Site »)
- Bipartisan Reform Commissions - a Comparison (CFA Site »)
- Obama Should Cooperate with Boehner and Cantor to Force Debate on Spending Reductions
- Not All Bipartisan Reform Commissions Are Created Equal
- Populist Politicians Use Poultry to Pontificate and Pander (ASA Site »)
- The Hidden Tax Hikes in the Obama Budget
Friday, February 5, 2010
- PACT Act May Reduce Tax Hike Pressures
- Arizona Congressional Candidate Eric Wnuck Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- David Schweikert Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for Congressional Race
- ATR and CFA Will Rate House Vote Against Debt Ceiling Hike and PAYGO
- Why Everyone Should be Worried About Craig Becker (and why Scott Brown needs to stop him)
Thursday, February 4, 2010
- New UAW Union-Foxwoods Contract Will Cost Connecticut Casinos Millions (AWF Site »)
- Guess Where Politicians From Socialised Medicine Countries Go For Healthcare...
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon (AWF Site »)
- Grover Norquist Urges Senators to CoSponsor Non-Government Spending Jobs Bill
- Jim Ward Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Arizona Congressional Race
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
- Good Evening Arizona Pledge Breakers
- The Obama Budget and Small Business
- Administration Pushes Ahead With Internet Takeover
- SEIU Response to Lobbying Investigation Tongue-Tied (AWF Site »)
- Brewer Sales Tax Hike Passed out of Senate Committee
- A Senate Vote for Craig Becker, NLRB Nom, is a Vote For Card Check (AWF Site »)
- Sound Tax Competition Policy From Switzerland
- U.S. Attorney Reviews AWF's Call for Probe of SEIU Activities with White House, Congress (AWF Site »)
- Colorado House Disregards U.S. and State Constitutions; Passes eTaxes (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- The President's Budget: No Fiscal Restraint in Sight
- Vulnerable Colorado Democrats Vote for Higher Taxes
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
- Colorado House Signs Off On Tax Package
- Do You Know Where Your Tax Dollars Go?
- US Attorney Reviews Call for Probe into SEIU President Andy Stern’s Lobbying Activities
- Property Rights is a Global Affair (PRA Site »)
- What does the "budget freeze" actually mean?
- Utah Legislators Paving the Way for Higher Taxes
- The Budget & International Tax Competition
- Initial Thoughts on the New Obama Budget
- Another Look At Employment Data
- Obama Labor Board Nominee, "workers should not be able to choose against having a union"
- State Level Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers in Illinois
- Presidential Math: Failed Policies + More Failed Policies = More Jobs
Monday, February 1, 2010
- The Effects of the Mere Possibility of a Bank Tax on Your 401(k) (ASA Site »)
- Very well, so there is a 'job boom'
- Survey Says: Legal Downloading Not So Bad (PRA Site »)
- Post "Stimulus" Unemployment: A Historical Perspective
- Virginia Senator Janet D. Howell Doesn't Get It
- Trains, Pains, and a Whole Lot of Subsidies
- Do You Know Which Candidates in Illinois Have Signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge?
- State of the Union Myth/Fact: Obama's Taxes on Energy & Families
- Real Stimulus Georgians Can Believe In
- Stimulus II: A Sequel America Cannot Afford (ASA Site »)
- SOTU: The President's Misguided Take on Spending
Friday, January 29, 2010
- Colorado House Finance Committee Passes Cadre of Tax Hikes
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Government-Run Healthcare - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Beth Coulson Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in 2010 Illinois House Race
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Obama's New Taxes on Your 401(k) - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax
-
GOP SC Gubernatorial Hopefuls Debate in Charleston Tonight,
ATR asks all to Sign Pledge
Thursday, January 28, 2010
- ATRF Analysis: Prevent Repatriation Of Earnings In Certain Cross-border Reorganizations
- Possible Heightened Regulation on Banks Similar to Attempted Regulation of Microsoft in Late 90s (ASA Site »)
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
- Your Chance to Tell DC’s Unionized Metro They #FAIL…In Person! (AWF Site »)
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
ATR Energy Tax Hike Series: Cap and Trade
From Brian M. Johnson & Ryan Ellis on Monday, April 6, 2009 9:30 AMBelow is the ATR energy tax hike series on cap and trade. ATR sends each item in the series to all members of Congress. If your member of Congress votes for this proposal...they can't say they "didn't know" this would cost jobs in your town.
ATR Obama Budget Analysis: Energy Tax Hike Series
Cap and Trade
Current Law
When world economies engage in global trade, there must be production of goods. This production of goods emits carbon. Under the Kyoto Protocol, several countries have implemented a method of cap and trade. Cap and trade is a system by which the government sets an arbitrary level, or “cap”, on the amount of carbon that companies are allowed to emit. Companies must then purchase credits from the government that represent the right to emit a specific amount. Companies that wish to increase their emissions must buy credits (the “trade”) from those who produce less.
In an effort to maintain United State competitiveness and productivity, there is not a current cap and trade system in effect. Every cap and trade system proposed in the U.S. Congress has been rejected by not only members, but the general public as well.
Obama Proposal
The Obama FY 2010 budget proposal will implement a cap and trade system on all American businesses.
ATR Analysis
The implementation of a cap and trade program on American businesses will result in a tax increase of $646 billion dollars over 10 years as called for in the Obama budget.
When fully phased in, this will be a $100 billion per year tax on American businesses and a $3,100 tax on every American family. This tax will decrease U.S. competitiveness and increase consumer costs.
Cap and trade systems punish businesses for being successful. As companies become more successful and employ more Americans, their production of goods increases. Along with this production, comes the natural byproduct from increased energy use. The purposeful taxation of this success by forcing an arbitrary cap on production emissions is counterproductive to a prosperous economy. Every family in America will pay this cap and trade tax in the form of higher energy prices.
For more information, contact tax policy director Ryan Ellis at rellis@atr.org or federal energy manager Brian Johnson at bjohnson@atr.org
Click here for the printable PDF.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: ENERGY, POLITICS, CONGRESS, SPENDING, OBAMA, BUDGET, Federal
Related Articles
Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes - Tuesday, February 9, 2010 11:47 AM
Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package - Monday, February 8, 2010 2:36 PM
More Job Creation By The Federal Government - Monday, February 8, 2010 9:30 AM
The Obama Budget - Friday, February 5, 2010 5:42 PM
Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs - Friday, February 5, 2010 4:01 PM












Comments
I am against any new tax that government wants to put on the American people. This cap and trade tax is just more control for government and takes more of my hard earned money. The current administration needs to do the same. When I hear of a Billion dollars cut from a budget I may begin to see they hear what we are saying from the TEA Parties. But only cutting $100 million is nothing more than a joke. The majority of American's can see right through this farce.
>> CoonOkie Friday, May 1, 2009 2:19 PM
Your own numbers don't track. $646 billion over ten years is $65 billion per year, not $100 billion. And $100 billion in taxes passed on to the 117 million families in this country (your figure) comes to under $900 a year, not $3100.
>> Freya Friday, May 15, 2009 9:56 PM
Im wondering if this is part of Obamas "I will not tax the Middle Class" plan??
>> Vaughn Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:02 AM