Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
Welcome to Pacific Rim Policy Exchange 2010
INDEX

ATR and CFA Support the Spending Limit Amendment

From Sandra Fabry on Thursday, March 4, 2010 3:16 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

As federal spending has been growing at unsustainable rates, and with entitlement spending on an explosive trajectory, Reps. Hensarling, Pence and Campbell have put forth a proposal for a Constitutional amendment which would limit federal spending to one-fifth of the economy. 

ATR and CFA support the amendment. From our letter of support:

It has become abundantly clear that the federal budget is on an unsustainable path with spending having increased to 24.7 percent of the economy. While this in itself is staggering in light of the fact that the historical average of post World War II federal spending has been hovering around 20 percent of GDP, this is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The outlook is much gloomier as federal spending is set to explode over the course of the next decades unless thoroughly overhauled.
 
Your amendment seeks to establish a national consensus over a necessary limit to the size and scope of government via a Constitutional amendment.  
 
It remains debatable whether the optimal size of government lies at 20 percent of GDP or lower. However, limiting federal spending to no more than 20 percent relative to the size of the economy is not only crucial if we want to get our fiscal house in order, it is also a very attainable goal. In fact, according to historical data provided by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), federal spending was kept around or under 20 percent of GDP in every year from 1996 to 2007. 
 
While enforcing the Spending Limit Amendment will involve some tough choices, these are important choices to be made as our spending and debt crisis will not go away and most certainly cannot be solved by enacting damaging tax increases. The Spending Limit Amendment provides for a reasonable hard limit on the size and scope of government and would set the necessary parameters to force a serious national debate over how to rein in discretionary spending, and reform our nation’s entitlement programs prudently and in a sustainable fashion.

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, CONGRESS, SPENDING, BUDGET, CFA, Federal

Comments

20 percent of GDP is already too much for the government to be spending, but this would definitely be a good way to prevent chronic overspending in the future. Republicans should propose more constitutional amendments - term limits, supermajority requirement for tax increases, etc. - to fundamentally change how Congress operates. This should be a priority when they retake the House and Senate.
>> Sam, VA Thursday, March 4, 2010 4:32 PM Report Comment

Although this is long overdue it really won't matter... considering the Senate passed "PAYGO", but has already voted to pass spending bills where the spending isn't accounted for.
>> Brad, IN Thursday, March 4, 2010 5:25 PM Report Comment

Do you think that if this thing gets passed they might redefine GDP in order to milk more money?
>> Bob M. Friday, March 5, 2010 11:13 AM Report Comment

@Sam, I agree 20% is still too much, but at this point, ANY sort of cap would make me feel a lot better. There's a great op-ed in the Washington Examiner today about the proposed amendment (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Why-wait-for-a-spending-limit_-86417047.html) discussing how both Dems and Republicans have to be wary of pointing fingers since everyone has been outspending our means lately.
>> Caitlin Friday, March 5, 2010 11:30 AM Report Comment

Add a Comment



91370

Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.