- Transparency Advocates Agree: White House Has Been "Useless" (CFA Site »)
- Rick Larsen Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
Thursday, September 9, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 8, 2010
- President Clings to Failure, Ignores Obvious Solutions
- Denny Heck Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
- Video: JFK vs. Obama on Tax Cuts
- Big Labor Backs Democrats in Hopes of a Pension Bailout (AWF Site »)
- Teacher's Pensions: Overblown and Underfunded (AWF Site »)
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
- Lassa Campaign Following the Tactics of the DCCC in WI-07
- Fact Checking President Obama's Labor Day Speech (AWF Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight September 7, 2010
- Senator Kerry at it Again
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
Thursday, August 26, 2010
ATR and CFA Support the Spending Limit Amendment
From Sandra Fabry on Thursday, March 4, 2010 3:16 PMAs federal spending has been growing at unsustainable rates, and with entitlement spending on an explosive trajectory, Reps. Hensarling, Pence and Campbell have put forth a proposal for a Constitutional amendment which would limit federal spending to one-fifth of the economy.
ATR and CFA support the amendment. From our letter of support:
It has become abundantly clear that the federal budget is on an unsustainable path with spending having increased to 24.7 percent of the economy. While this in itself is staggering in light of the fact that the historical average of post World War II federal spending has been hovering around 20 percent of GDP, this is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. The outlook is much gloomier as federal spending is set to explode over the course of the next decades unless thoroughly overhauled.Your amendment seeks to establish a national consensus over a necessary limit to the size and scope of government via a Constitutional amendment.It remains debatable whether the optimal size of government lies at 20 percent of GDP or lower. However, limiting federal spending to no more than 20 percent relative to the size of the economy is not only crucial if we want to get our fiscal house in order, it is also a very attainable goal. In fact, according to historical data provided by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), federal spending was kept around or under 20 percent of GDP in every year from 1996 to 2007.While enforcing the Spending Limit Amendment will involve some tough choices, these are important choices to be made as our spending and debt crisis will not go away and most certainly cannot be solved by enacting damaging tax increases. The Spending Limit Amendment provides for a reasonable hard limit on the size and scope of government and would set the necessary parameters to force a serious national debate over how to rein in discretionary spending, and reform our nation’s entitlement programs prudently and in a sustainable fashion.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, CONGRESS, SPENDING, BUDGET, CFA, Federal














Comments
20 percent of GDP is already too much for the government to be spending, but this would definitely be a good way to prevent chronic overspending in the future. Republicans should propose more constitutional amendments - term limits, supermajority requirement for tax increases, etc. - to fundamentally change how Congress operates. This should be a priority when they retake the House and Senate.
>> Sam, VA Thursday, March 4, 2010 4:32 PM Report Comment
Although this is long overdue it really won't matter... considering the Senate passed "PAYGO", but has already voted to pass spending bills where the spending isn't accounted for.
>> Brad, IN Thursday, March 4, 2010 5:25 PM Report Comment
Do you think that if this thing gets passed they might redefine GDP in order to milk more money?
>> Bob M. Friday, March 5, 2010 11:13 AM Report Comment
@Sam, I agree 20% is still too much, but at this point, ANY sort of cap would make me feel a lot better. There's a great op-ed in the Washington Examiner today about the proposed amendment (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Why-wait-for-a-spending-limit_-86417047.html) discussing how both Dems and Republicans have to be wary of pointing fingers since everyone has been outspending our means lately.
>> Caitlin Friday, March 5, 2010 11:30 AM Report Comment