Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
Welcome to Pacific Rim Policy Exchange 2010
INDEX

ATR and CFA: Reject the Conrad/Gregg Commission

From Sandra Fabry on Tuesday, December 22, 2009 1:08 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

While the Senate is moving closer towards a final vote on the Obama-Reid healthcare overhaul, one item of unfinished business is still on the agenda for this year - the vote to raise the debt ceiling.  The House has already passed H.R. 4314 which would increase the statutory limit on the national debt by $290 billion, from $12.104 trillion to $12.394 trillion. 

The Senate is still looking to pass the debt ceiling increase before the year is out, and there still is the danger of Sens. Conrad and Gregg insisting on offering their ill-conceived tax/spending "reform" commission bill as an amendment to the debt ceiling bill.

ATR and CFA have been pointing out the dangers of such a commission as envisioned by Sens. Conrad and Gregg on numerous occasions, and, in the event this issue comes up before year's end, have informed Senators that both groups would negatively score a vote in support of the commission in our annual congressional ratings.

From our vote alert:

In the event this issue comes before the U.S. Senate before year’s end, Americans for Tax Reform and the Center for Fiscal Accountability urge all members to vote “No” on any amendment to H.R. 4314 establishing the Conrad/Gregg bipartisan commission to develop legislation making wholesale changes to the tax code and spending policy.

While innocuous-sounding, a commission as envisioned by Sens. Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) would lead to a guaranteed tax increase:

It would establish an eighteen-member task force comprised of ten Democrat and eight Republican Congressmen, Senators, and Administration officials. A report from the commission would need to gather fourteen votes in order to make an expedited recommendation to both bodies. The recommendation would only pass with a supermajority vote in each chamber.

Despite the appearance of protection for taxpayers, this commission would guarantee a net tax increase be in its proposal. Every Democrat on the commission would insist on tax increases to “balance” spending cuts in the recommendation.

There is no conceivable scenario whereby the commission would issue a report that does not contain tax hikes.

To be acceptable from a taxpayer perspective, language would have to be included that explicitly removes tax increases and/or new taxes from commission consideration, but, as envisioned by Sens. Conrad and Gregg, setting up this commission would be a horrible deal for taxpayers.

Stand up for Taxpayers!

Vote “NO” on any amendment to H.R. 4314 establishing the Conrad/Gregg bipartisan tax/spending “reform” commission!

ATR and CFA WOULD SCORE POSITIVELY a vote AGAINST the Conrad/Gregg commission in our annual Congressional ratings.

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, CONGRESS, SPENDING, CFA

Comments

THE $70 Trillion obligated debt we're handing our children will require their taxes to be about 80% to pay it. It's about the four letter word former comptroller general David Walker says we can't around...Math. If you're against a commission you're against addressing the debt. We can't even close military bases without a commission let alone cutting medicare benefits.
>> Michael Grenier Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:20 PM Report Comment

We're not against a commission. What we're against is a commission the foregone conclusion of which is tax increases. We have endorsed various commission bills before that address the issue (Rep. McHenry's bill, Rep. Sullivan's bill), but the key is to look at excessive government spending, and not to give tax-and-spenders a convenient excuse to raise taxes to cover their big spending tracks. Also, look at what happened in 1990 - a bipartisan deal to cut spending for every dollar in taxes raised. Except what we got was higher taxes and only phony spending cuts with the end result that both taxes and spending went up. We just can't afford an Andrews Air Force Base Part II.
>> Sandra Fabry Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:05 PM Report Comment

As I write this Senator Baucus is reading letter from AARP and other retired groups speaking against the Conrad/Gregg commission as they want entitlements off the table. You want taxes off the table and liberals want real spending off the table. With a $70 Trillion obligated debt that leaves us with "pork" which amounts to nothing. Our grandchildren should get ready to pay our entire bar bill as we have no discipline.
>> Michael Grenier Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:46 PM Report Comment

Add a Comment



94503

Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.