Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
The Post Mortem on Maryland’s Special Tax Hike Session http://t.co/6nFjgjfF
taxreformer
What Tax Hikes Does Beth Anne Rankin (@BethAnneRankin) Support? http://t.co/dBs5DuV2 #AR04
taxreformer
What Tax Hikes Does Beth Anne Rankin Support? http://t.co/92cfRfYF
taxreformer
CoGC: Nanny State Update: Smoke Free Smoking Lounges, Ducking the Truth, Bag Bans and Soda Taxes http://t.co/Nqj3G8c7
taxreformer
Taxing Facebook to Pay for MySpace http://t.co/SSzTOJvd
taxreformer
My quick piece in @NRO: Illinois Republicans for Obamacare? http://t.co/5p9KnSi8 ^
joshuaculling
RT @amoylan: @taxreformer No wonder Jeff Fortenberry doesn't stand by tax pledge. http://t.co/55cW7B7B Lifetime @NTU Rating: 61.8%. http ...
amoylan
RT @RATECoalition: Check out @taxreformer ‘s take on Robert Rizzi & Jon Sallet’s study on corp #taxes & innovation http://t.co/z ...
RATECoalition
RT @GarciaCD16: Proud to announce that I have signed the @taxreformer "No New Taxes" Pledge! Taxpayers of #CD16 know I'm on their side! ...
GarciaCD16
ATR Rejects Gov. Quinn's Reckless Medicaid "Reform" Proposal http://t.co/554Cxwcp
taxreformer
The full letter sent from ATR opposing the Employee Free Choice Act and the provisions within:
March 10, 2009
Dear Member of Congress:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), representing a coalition of taxpayers, businesses and working Americans, I am writing to alert you to the dangers posed by the “Employee Free Choice Act” (EFCA). If this bill is passed, this law will compromise your constituents’ freedoms and place their safety at risk. Additionally, at a time when the United States can least afford it, this bill will cost 600,000 American jobs within the first year.
Introduced on Tuesday, March 10th, by Rep. Miller (D-Calif.) and Sen. Harkin (D-Iowa), as you know, the EFCA will eliminate a worker’s right to a federally-supervised private ballot election. Instead, secret ballots will be replaced by a kind of open-air petition known as a “card check.” Under this system, workers would lose their right to privacy. Employers, union organizers, and co-workers would all know if your constituents vote for or against unionization.
Too often, unions have resorted to petition-like “card check” campaigns which take the decision for union representation from the private voting booth to the front porch of workers. Reports have indicated that the public signing (or not) of these petitions leads to violence, bribery, and/or distorting the truth to workers. This bill, if passed, will encourage similar abuses resulting from these “card check” petitions.
Besides risky “card check” schemes, the EFCA presents other excessive demands from Big Labor. Prominent among these is its requirement for mandatory, binding arbitration in the event that unions refuse to continue with contract negotiations. Binding arbitration would be imposed on both the employer and the collective bargaining unit (the workers), regardless if they support the union or not. Decisions of federal arbitration boards in these cases would be binding upon both parties for two years.
In closing, I wish to personally inform you that my staff and I are working with our expansive grassroots network to ensure that the voting citizens are aware of the dangers posed by card check. Additionally, this vote will be scored in our annual “Hero of the Taxpayer” Congressional ratings and voting for the Employee Free Choice Act, will negatively affect your contention for the award.
Onward,
Grover G. Norquist
GGN/bmj
For more information, contact federal affairs manager Brian M Johnson at bjohnson@atr.org or 202-785-0266